Nora Lester Murad - The View From My Window in Palestine

  • About Me
    • Bio
    • Contact Me
    • Sign up for updates
  • My Writing
    • Life Under Occupation
    • Video/Radio
    • Guest Posts
    • Aid and Development
    • Gaza!
    • Palestinian Literary Scene
  • My Books
    • Ida in the Middle
    • Rest in My Shade
    • I Found Myself in Palestine
  • Shop
  • Email
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

More Important Than Becoming a Writer…

July 28, 2018 by Nora Lester Murad

Fire Burning Under Water, Maysanne T. Murad (2018)

These days, I delete all emails related to writing and publishing. I work fast to avoid being intrigued by subject lines. With each click I feel a millisecond of clarity (nothing is more important than family), but the swishing sound of the trash emptying makes my chest tighten with something like grief: I have lost the joy of writing, at least for now. All I write these days are emails about treatment modalities and appeal letters to insurance companies.

Not long ago, however, I forced myself to read a blog post about book promotion because, while I do not have the energy to care much, my first book will be released in a few months; and I owe it to those who supported me to try to make the book successful.

With my guard down, I lost myself in the practical minutia of soliciting book reviews when I came across a sentence that started: “I am OCD, so I research every opportunity….” The casual reference to OCD upset me terribly. I wrote immediately to the writer of the article: “OCD is not being detail-oriented or hard working. It is a debilitating mental illness caused by a brain dysfunction.” Neither the writer of the post nor the blogger who hosted it wanted to write a retraction or clarification (although the offending sentence was removed from the online version). I understand completely. Being a regular person with imperfections can interfere with the trajectory of a writer’s “success.”

But the fact remains: There is such a thing as being “paranoid” (with a lower case p), that is  not at all the same as being “Paranoid” (with a capital P). People suffering from mental illness and their families are harmed when we don’t recognize the difference. Even though every mental illness is different and every person’s experience of mental illness is unique, I know this much from my own personal experience.

My 14-year old has Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) and our lives revolve around it, are controlled by it, and are hurt by it in deep and inexplicable ways. There is no facet of her life or mine that is untouched by her OCD.  Still, she is not OCD. She is a person with an illness, not the illness itself.  Not making the distinction between the person and illness – explicitly and repeatedly – does harm. Therapists even suggest that kids name their OCD to remember that they are not their illness. My daughter’s OCD is named Jarrad. When my daughter has intrusive thoughts (constant, negative, terrifying thoughts that are completely involuntary), I remind her: ‘That is not you. That is Jarrad trying to trick you into doing compulsions. You must believe that you have the power to tell him to shut up.’”

I have read that most people who suffer from OCD know very well that their thoughts and behaviors are irrational (unlike sufferers of some other mental illnesses), and because they are ashamed, they often go through extreme measures to hide their symptoms. People close to them may think they are quirky or weird, but often don’t realize there is a problem until it interferes with daily living. At that point, OCD behaviors may be dismissed as a “phase.” They may be labeled as disobedient (“Why do you insist on always making us late?”) or considered weak (“Why can’t you just ignore those thoughts if you know they are irrational?”) For all these reasons, it is common for suffers of OCD not to talk about their illness and not get the help they need.

No one tells a person with a chronic, incurable, painful heart condition that they should “get over it,” but they often say just that to a person with a chronic, incurable, painful brain condition like OCD. No one would write, “I’m Congestive Heart Failure” when explaining that they can’t catch their breath at the top of a flight of stairs, but they don’t think twice about saying, “I’m OCD” when casually describing their tendency to aspire to perfection.

In fact, the whole family suffers when a loved one has mental illness. Since Jarrad pushed his way into our lives, more and more of my daughter’s time – and mine – is stolen by her anxiety and my need to either prevent it or respond to it. When she is compelled to remake her bed ten times so that someone at school won’t die or when she walks in a certain pattern up and down every aisle of a department store to prevent a bomb from falling, I get angry, overwhelmed and feel hopeless. I need and deserve the help of a community (and a mental health system!) that understands that my daughter didn’t choose to be sick. She’s not sick because I’m a bad mother. And she isn’t OCD! She is a complex, worthwhile, lovable, smart, funny, creative and fantastic person.

Sadly, it is common for people to belittle her suffering by saying, “Oh yeah, I have OCD too,” or “Take advantage of your OCD to do well in school,” or when they tell me that I’m lucky that my daughter has OCD because their kids don’t keep their bedrooms clean the way my daughter does. Or they say, “She looks just fine to me!” as if they know what’s inside her brain. She often thinks that no one will ever understand her. She isolates herself looking for safety. Her healing gets harder.

I don’t know what it feels like to have OCD (as my daughter reminds me several times a day), but I do know what it’s like to love someone who does. I know what it’s like to spend every waking moment trying to get us through each day without a crisis, organizing our lives around what I think she can or can’t handle, and then changing plans at the last minute if she’s had a particularly bad nightmare or if a particular smell has triggered a breakdown. I know what its like to reorganize my priorities so that health is more important than just about everything else I ever cared about.

Somewhere inside of me, there is still a passion for writing. But right now, I can’t concentrate enough to read the stack of novels next to my bed, much less to write my own. Instead, I read about OCD, about trauma, about therapeutic doses and co-morbidity. When I talk about what we’re going through I learn that nearly every single one of us is somehow touched by mental illness. So why did so many people ask, “Are you sure you want to write about your experience and share it with the whole world?” Why wouldn’t I? We have absolutely nothing to be ashamed of (and yes, my daughter did encourage me to publish this piece).

Nora Lester Murad is not a mental health expert. She is the mother of three amazing daughters, one of whom has OCD and related brain dysfunctions. She participates in a family support group run by the National Alliance on Mental Illness – New York (NAMI-NYC) and believes fervently in their efforts to end stigma. Her first book will be released in a few months but the sense of accomplishment she expected totally eludes her. Simply put: Some things are more important than writing and publishing right now.

Philanthropy to Israel and Palestine – it’s time to change the framing

July 24, 2018 by Nora Lester Murad

*UPDATE* This article is now free to the public!  https://www.alliancemagazine.org/analysis/philanthropy-to-israel-and-palestine-its-time-to-change-the-framing/

What an honor it was to be asked by Alliance Magazine, a preeminent publication in the field of global philanthropy, to become a “Philanthropy Thinker.” I will contribute an analytical piece annually.

My first piece (just published) was on a topic near and dear to my heart: how philanthropy to Israel and Palestine are framed. In it, I try to argue that the framing of Israeli diaspora philanthropy and Palestinian diaspora philanthropy as two parallel, unrelated, and benign trends is false and harmful.

If you’re a subscriber, you can find the full article here (and if you live in Palestine or a country in the Global South, you can subscribe for free). For the rest, please consider subscribing to Alliance. If you can’t, my article will no longer have a paywall around mid-October and you’ll be able to access it freely.

The comments are already lively, and I hope you’ll join in.

Deeper issues for Arab philanthropy need to be discussed

May 22, 2018 by Nora Lester Murad

This article is the result of a request by Philanthropy for Social Justice and Peace. It first appeared on their website and simultaneously in Alliance Magazine.

A comprehensive and well-written report, Caroline Hartnell’s just-released Philanthropy in the Arab Region: A working paper gave me a feeling of déjà vu. The report featured the same deservedly respected experts that are featured in every report on Arab philanthropy, and they were saying things I’d heard for years at conferences, in articles, and, I felt sure, in other ‘state of the field’ reports.

I scoured my files and found document after document, all covering similar themes: acknowledging traditional forms of giving, bemoaning the lack of a legal/regulatory framework, complaining about insufficient professionalization in the field, lamenting the weakness of the civil society sector, and explaining the difficulty of getting Arabs to give to secular institutions with objectives that are broader than poverty alleviation. Then, in conclusion, there is a sense of optimism that with more effort and time and more international support, things will get better.

I traced the origin of many of these themes back to the then-groundbreaking 2008 tome From Charity to Social Change: Trends in Arab Philanthropy by Barbara Ibrahim and Dina Sherif, the original mavericks behind the John T Gerhart Center for Civic Engagement in the Arab World at the American University of Cairo.

Is it possible that so little has changed in ten years?

Sadly, it is possible. After all these years, the report reveals the persistence of a predominant and unexamined assumption in the Arab philanthropic sector that progress can be measured by the extent to which it looks more and more like western philanthropy. The concept of philanthropy is frequently conflated with money, which impoverishes local communities by accounting for their lack of money rather than valuing the abundance of their non-monetary resources. It conflates philanthropy with the organizational structure that the west calls a foundation, as in the statement: ‘In Tunisia, where there are no local foundations, almost all philanthropic money currently comes from foreign sources.’ The local sharing, giving and multiplicity of forms of social solidarity that have held old cultures together for generations are not given the attention they deserve.

Much is said about the need to build philanthropic infrastructure like in the west (eg tax deductibility), but these conclusions are drawn from comparisons that lack historic and economic context. The US philanthropic sector in the US, and especially the structure of the foundation, was built with the spoils of US colonialism, militarism, and unsustainable consumerism. The generation that was born poor and died rich because of stock market growth and exploitation of workers created legal/financial structures that let them expand their influence under the guise of charity. Which part of this history can – and should – the Arab world try to emulate?

In this rush to westernize, there is also insufficient attention to how Arab (and other) civil society actors become more vulnerable when they link their aspirations to the west. They become vulnerable to pressure to work in English and to explain their goals in ways that will make western donors feel comfortable, and to political pressures embedded in anti-terrorism and other US foreign policy agendas. Perhaps most importantly, a non-critical approach may see the west as a source of funds, but fail to recognize the west (or global north) as a source of many of the economic, political and military interventions that cause the problems that Arab philanthropy seeks to alleviate.

From this point of view, the requirement that civil society organize itself into NGOs is a kind of cultural imperialism. Arab philanthropy, one would hope, would be more open to and supportive of communities’ own forms of organization and methods for pursuing their own agendas. But this would be a mistake. This would assume that Arab philanthropy is automatically supportive of Arab communities, that it is more progressive because it serves its own people.

But with the exception of comments by community philanthropist and activist Marwa El-Daly, there is virtually no discussion in the field (or in this report) about the need for fundamental changes in power structures and democratization of access to resources. The term ‘accountability’ appears only four times in the 58-page report, and the concept is treated superficially rather than as a fundamental requirement of good philanthropy.

As a result, Philanthropy in the Arab World: A working paper, gives the impression that increasing giving of money is an objective in and of itself. That’s why there is such interest in corporate giving without a corresponding concern about the importance of civil society’s independence from the private and public sectors. The challenge of government’s relationship with civil society isn’t a technical one, it’s a fundamental struggle about democratic vs oligarchic control.

My position should be clear by now: “real” philanthropy is social justice philanthropy. Unfortunately, I couldn’t tell in Hartnell’s report which agenda Arab philanthropy wants to support. Shouldn’t we worry less about how much money we have or don’t have and more about what we’re trying to accomplish in the world? Fortunately, the report is a ‘working paper’, so there’s still time to address these deeper issues.

Palestinian Women Are Harassed and Humiliated at Checkpoints. Here Are a Few of Their Stories

October 17, 2017 by Nora Lester Murad

Mariam Barghouti gives space for my youngest daughter to tell about her first Israeli interrogation at age 12 and for me to describe my recurrent harassment at Ben Gurion airport, in her article in The Forward, “Palestinian Women Are Harassed and Humiliated at Checkpoints. Here Are a Few of Their Stories.” Read the full piece here.

 

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • …
  • 60
  • Next Page »

Recent Posts

  • The convos jumbled in my heart and head
  • ADL’s Stats Twist Israel’s Critics Into Antisemites
  • Is Fire Enough to Get Americans to Empathize with Palestinians?
  • CNN essentially publishes ADL PR, fails to investigate recent educational conference accusations
  • Educators Beware: The Anti-Defamation League Is Not the Social Justice Partner It Claims to Be

Tweets!

Could not authenticate you.
  • Contact Me
  • About Me
  • Archive
  • Sign up for updates

Copyright © 2025, All rights reserved
Website Maintained by AtefDesign